
A publication of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
| Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now. |
|
Abstract
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research July 2005:20:1216-1222 (doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050314)
What Proportion of Incident Radiographic Vertebral Deformities Is Clinically Diagnosed and Vice Versa? Howard A Fink, 1,2,3,4 Donna L Milavetz, 4 Lisa Palermo, 5 Michael C Nevitt, 5 Jane A Cauley, 6 Harry K Genant, 7 Dennis M Black, 5 Kristine E Ensrud, 2,3,4 for the Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group 1Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 2Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 3Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 4Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; 6Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; 7Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. Address reprint requests to: Howard A Fink, MD, MPH GRECC 11-G VA Medical Center One Veterans Drive Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA E-mail: howard.fink@med.va.gov We prospectively examined, in a large cohort of older women, the proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities diagnosed as incident clinical vertebral fractures in the same women at the same vertebral level. The proportion of deformities clinically diagnosed ranged from <15% for milder deformities to nearly 30% for more severe deformities. Introduction: The relationship between radiographic and clinical vertebral fractures is incompletely understood. No previous study has prospectively compared the agreement between incident radiographic vertebral deformities and incident community-recognized, radiographically confirmed vertebral fractures in the same women at the same vertebral level(s). Materials and Methods: This analysis of data from the Fracture Intervention Trial included all participants who completed both baseline and at least one scheduled follow-up lateral spinal radiograph (n = 6084). Incident vertebral deformities were defined at a given vertebral level as a reduction between baseline and closeout radiographs of ≥20% and 4 mm in any vertebral height and subdivided into two severity categories. Incident clinical vertebral fractures were those reported to clinical centers by participants and confirmed by the study radiologist, who compared the community spinal radiograph with the participant's baseline study radiograph using semiquantitative methods. Results: A total of 446 incident radiographic vertebral deformities were identified in 330 women, whereas 121 women experienced one or more confirmed incident clinical vertebral fracture. Of incident radiograpic vertebral deformities, 22.6% were also clinically diagnosed as incident vertebral fractures, with clinical diagnoses made for 28.4% of the deformities that exceeded 30% and 4 mm height loss (severe deformity) compared with 14.3% for deformities that involved ≥20% and 4 mm but <30% height loss (milder deformity). Of incident clinical vertebral fractures, 72.7% were morphometrically identified as incident deformities, most of them as severe deformities. More than 20% of incident clinical fractures were not identified as incident deformities by even the most liberal morphometric criterion used in this study. Conclusions: Approximately one-fourth of incident radiographic vertebral deformities were clinically diagnosed as new vertebral fractures, although the proportion clinically diagnosed was increased for more severe deformities. Whereas most incident clinical vertebral fractures were identified as severe morphometric deformities, approximately one-fourth did not meet even the most liberal study criterion for morphometric deformity. Further study of factors that may explain the discordance between incident vertebral deformities and incident clinical vertebral fractures is important. Cited byPeiqi Chen, John H Krege, Jonathan D Adachi, Jerilynn C Prior, Alan Tenenhouse, Jacques P Brown, Emmanuel Papadimitropoulos, Nancy Kreiger, Wojciech P Olszynski, Robert G Josse, David Goltzman and the CaMOS Research Group. (2009) Vertebral Fracture Status and the World Health Organization Risk Factors for Predicting Osteoporotic Fracture Risk. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 24:3, 495-502 Online publication date: 1-Mar-2009. Abstract | Full Text | Printable PDF (463 KB) Jane A Cauley, Lisa Palermo, Molly Vogt, Kristine E Ensrud, Susan Ewing, Marc Hochberg, Michael C Nevitt and Dennis M Black. (2008) Prevalent Vertebral Fractures in Black Women and White Women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 23:9, 1458-1467 Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008. Abstract | Full Text | Printable PDF (1311 KB) Kristine E Ensrud, John L Stock, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Deborah Grady, Lori Mosca, Kay-Tee Khaw, Qingwen Zhao, Donato Agnusdei and Jane A Cauley. (2008) Effects of Raloxifene on Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women: The Raloxifene Use for The Heart Trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 23:1, 112-120 Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008. Abstract | Full Text | Printable PDF (952 KB) John T Schousboe, Howard A Fink, Li-Yung Lui, Brent C Taylor and Kristine E Ensrud. (2006) Association Between Prior Non-Spine Non-Hip Fractures or Prevalent Radiographic Vertebral Deformities Known to be at Least 10 Years Old and Incident Hip Fracture. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 21:10, 1557-1564 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2006. Abstract | Full Text | Printable PDF (624 KB) |
|